Every security team needs a hands-on, scalable way to manage IT risk—not just monitor outside scores.
Platforms like Bitsight and SecurityScorecard provide vendor intelligence, helping organizations spot potential risks through external ratings and benchmarks.
External scores can highlight issues, but they don’t help you assess, track, or resolve them in a structured, actionable way.
Isora GRC creates a simpler, more efficient process. It’s purpose-built for security teams who need to run real assessments, manage inventories, and track risks, without relying solely on surface-level insights.
Let’s take a more detailed glance.
Choosing the Right Platform for IT Risk Management
Bitsight and SecurityScorecard are both built around external risk scoring. They scan vendors for signals like exposed services or leaked credentials and assign a numerical score. That’s helpful for monitoring—but not for managing risk. You can’t assess vendor controls, request documentation, or track issues inside these platforms.
Isora GRC picks up where they leave off. It’s built to help security teams manage vendor risk from end to end. That means issuing custom or framework-based questionnaires (like HECVAT or SIG), logging findings, assigning ownership, and maintaining a dynamic, auditable risk register. If you’re ready to move from passive observation to active management, Isora gives you the structure to make it repeatable.
The Workflow That Matters: Managing IT Risks and Compliance
Knowing that a vendor has a low score doesn’t mean you’ve managed the risk. That takes context, documentation, stakeholder input, and follow-up. Bitsight and SecurityScorecard may tell you what’s exposed, but they don’t help you evaluate compensating controls, verify evidence, or coordinate remediation.
Isora GRC supports that full workflow. From assessment to resolution, every step is structured, trackable, and repeatable. Whether you’re managing a dozen vendors or hundreds, Isora makes it easy to keep risk visible, decisions documented, and progress measurable.
How Each Platform Supports IT Risk Management Workflows
| Workflow Area | Bitsight | SecurityScorecard | Isora GRC |
| Assessment Management | Bitsight tracks security ratings and third-party risks. But it may lack full assessment management features. | SecurityScorecard focuses on rating and checking outside companies for security risks. This helps with vendor risk but doesn’t go deep enough for full internal assessments. Teams needing risk checks across many departments might want more control and flexibility. | Centralized, intuitive assessment dashboard across business units, vendors, and assets. Built specifically for security teams. |
| Questionnaire Delivery & Completion | Bitsight focuses on ratings, not on forms. Teams needing strong questionnaire tools may need extra help. | SecurityScorecard doesn’t focus on sending surveys or forms. It mainly runs automatic checks on third-party risks. This may not work well for teams needing custom surveys or forms for internal use. | Customizable and prebuilt questionnaires for frameworks like NIST, ISO, GLBA, HIPAA, and more. Designed for internal and external collaboration. |
| Inventory Tracking | Bitsight looks at external security, not asset tracking. This can limit teams with large inventories. | SecurityScorecard skips full inventory tools. It works mostly on security ratings for outside vendors. Companies with large internal systems or many assets might find this missing feature a problem. | Centralized tracking of assets, vendors, and organizational units with integration support for existing data sources. |
| Risk Register & Exception Management | Insights on third-party risk exist, but deeper risk tracking is missing. Extra tools may be needed. | SecurityScorecard gives insight into third-party risks but lacks full risk register tools and detailed exception handling. Companies needing full internal tracking for risks and exceptions might feel limited. | Flexible, collaborative risk register with scoring, status, evidence, and ownership tied directly to assessments. Exception management is built-in and intuitive—no extra modules or configuration required. |
| Scoring, Reporting & Risk Visualization | Security scores come with insights, but risk visuals may feel too simple. | SecurityScorecard does well with external security ratings and reports. But those needing deep reports and charts for internal risks might find the platform too narrow. Reports focus on outside risks, not full internal tracking. | Automated scorecards, risk maps, and executive-friendly reports with actionable insights—no manual config required. |
| Collaboration & User Experience | The interface suits security pros. Still, team collaboration tools feel limited. | The design is clean and works well for security teams checking outside risks. But tools for teamwork may feel weak compared to platforms built for broader tasks. Internal risk teams might miss features for better group work. | WCAG-compliant, award-nominated interface with built-in commenting, team workflows, and fast onboarding. |
| Implementation & Setup | Setup feels simple for security-focused teams. But those needing full GRC features may hit limits. | Setup is simple for companies focused on vendor risks. But those needing a full GRC system for internal work may need extra tools. The system fits outside risk checks best, with limited links to internal processes. | No-code setup in days or weeks. Minimal IT lift required. Designed to go live quickly across teams and vendors. |
What Sets Isora GRC Apart?
Isora GRC was purpose-built for information security teams—designed to support the real workflows behind risk and compliance, not just generate reports. While legacy GRC platforms require months of configuration and rigid processes, Isora takes a modern, scalable approach:
- Purpose-built for security and third-party risk teams
- No extra modules or cross-department bloat—just the workflows that matter.
- Easy for anyone to use
- Clean UI, no complex training, and built to drive adoption across the org.
- Streamlined for action, not just documentation
- Assessments, questionnaires, inventories, risk tracking, and reporting—all in one place.
- Fast, no-code implementation
- Go live in weeks, not quarters, with minimal IT lift.
- Scales with your program
- Whether you’re running a lean risk function or supporting a large institution, Isora grows with you—without getting in the way.
Who Each Platform Is Best For
| Platform | Who It’s For |
| Bitsight | Companies tracking risk scores for vendors. Looks good on reports but doesn’t dig deep. |
| SecurityScorecard | Seeing how vendors stack up at a glance. Doesn’t help much with full program management. |
| Isora GRC | Security teams that need a scalable, usable IT risk management program across their organization. |
What Our Customers Say About Isora GRC
Security teams at top institutions are using Isora GRC to replace legacy tools and manual processes with intuitive workflows and actionable insight.
FAQs
What’s the difference between Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, and Isora GRC?
Bitsight and SecurityScorecard provide external security ratings based on publicly observable data. Isora GRC supports broader third-party risk management workflows, including sending security questionnaires, managing vendor inventories, tracking exceptions, and maintaining a centralized risk register.
Are Bitsight and SecurityScorecard considered vendor risk management platforms?
They provide vendor intelligence—but they aren’t built to manage end-to-end risk workflows. They offer valuable external signals but lack tools for collecting internal evidence, assigning ownership, or tracking remediation over time.
Does Isora GRC replace platforms like Bitsight or SecurityScorecard?
For many teams, yes. Isora GRC allows organizations to assess vendors directly, manage third-party data in one place, and drive actual follow-up—not just observe risk scores.
Which platform is better for managing vendor risk across the organization?
Isora GRC is designed for full third-party risk workflows. It supports frameworks like HECVAT, SIG, and CAIQ, while also providing vendor inventory, assessment, and exception tracking capabilities—none of which are core features in Bitsight or SecurityScorecard.
Can Isora GRC be used alongside Bitsight or SecurityScorecard?
Yes. Some organizations use Bitsight or SecurityScorecard for initial vendor screening or continuous monitoring and use Isora GRC for actual assessment management and ongoing collaboration with vendors.
What should I look for in a platform to manage vendor risk effectively?
Look for tools that support vendor assessments, evidence collection, exception tracking, and collaboration—not just surface-level risk scores. Isora GRC delivers those workflows in a centralized platform security teams can own.
Other Relevant Content 