Every security team needs a robust, scalable way to manage IT risk—not just rely on external vendor ratings.
Platforms like Black Kite and Bitsight offer vendor intelligence, providing external scores to help identify risks within your third-party relationships.
External scores can highlight issues, but they don’t help you assess, track, or resolve those risks in a comprehensive and actionable way.
Isora GRC offers a focused alternative. It’s purpose-built for security teams who need to run assessments, manage inventories, and track risks—moving beyond surface-level vendor scores to deep, real-world risk management.
Let’s explore this in depth.
Choosing the Right Platform for IT Risk Management
Black Kite and Bitsight manage risk through internet-facing signals. But vendor risk isn’t just about perimeter vulnerabilities—it’s about internal practices, control maturity, and real accountability. Tools that only monitor from the outside like Black Kite and Bitsight don’t give you a complete picture, nor the means to act.
Isora GRC is built to handle vendor risk from the inside out. It enables you to issue assessments, validate security postures, collect SOC 2 reports or SIG questionnaires, track findings, and push risk insights into broader reporting structures. It integrates with your vendor inventory and scales across any number of assessments.
The Workflow That Matters: Managing IT Risks and Compliance
Security ratings may tell you what’s wrong—but they don’t help you fix it. Without workflows to engage vendors, gather context, and escalate exceptions, teams end up reactive and overburdened.
Isora GRC gives security teams control. Every workflow—assessment, inventory, exception, follow-up—is built for repeatability and clarity. Whether for compliance or operational oversight, Isora helps you build a third-party risk program that delivers real outcomes.
How Each Platform Supports IT Risk Management Workflows
| Workflow Area | Black Kite | Bitsight | Isora GRC |
| Assessment Management | Black Kite checks vendor risks using ratings. Some users say the setup doesn’t always match team workflows and needs extra setup. | BitSight tracks security ratings and third-party risks. But it may lack full assessment management features. | Centralized, intuitive assessment dashboard across business units, vendors, and assets. Built specifically for security teams. |
| Questionnaire Delivery & Completion | Black Kite leans on automatic checks. It may not support strong survey tools. Teams needing many detailed surveys may feel restricted. | BitSight focuses on ratings, not on forms. Teams needing strong questionnaire tools may need extra help. | Customizable and prebuilt questionnaires for frameworks like NIST, ISO, GLBA, HIPAA, and more. Designed for internal and external collaboration. |
| Inventory Tracking | Black Kite focuses on third-party risk. Full inventory tools aren’t included. Companies with big internal systems might need other tools. | BitSight looks at external security, not asset tracking. This can limit teams with large inventories. | Centralized tracking of assets, vendors, and organizational units with integration support for existing data sources. |
| Risk Register & Exception Management | Black Kite helps track risks but lacks full tools for risk registers and exceptions. Teams needing deeper internal tracking may find limits. | Insights on third-party risk exist, but deeper risk tracking is missing. Extra tools may be needed. | Flexible, collaborative risk register with scoring, status, evidence, and ownership tied directly to assessments. Exception management is built-in and intuitive—no extra modules or configuration required. |
| Scoring, Reporting & Risk Visualization | Black Kite offers ratings and insights. But advanced charts and reporting tools may feel too simple for some users. | Security scores come with insights, but risk visuals may feel too simple. | Automated scorecards, risk maps, and executive-friendly reports with actionable insights—no manual config required. |
| Collaboration & User Experience | The design focuses on security checks. Some say the way it works feels confusing at first and takes time to learn. | The interface suits security pros. Still, team collaboration tools feel limited. | WCAG-compliant, award-nominated interface with built-in commenting, team workflows, and fast onboarding. |
| Implementation & Setup | Setup is quick for teams focused on security ratings. But for GRC needs beyond that, the platform may fall short. | Setup feels simple for security-focused teams. But those needing full GRC features may hit limits. | No-code setup in days or weeks. Minimal IT lift required. Designed to go live quickly across teams and vendors. |
What Sets Isora GRC Apart?
Isora GRC was purpose-built for information security teams—designed to support the real workflows behind risk and compliance, not just generate reports. While legacy GRC platforms require months of configuration and rigid processes, Isora takes a modern, scalable approach:
- Purpose-built for security and third-party risk teams
- No extra modules or cross-department bloat—just the workflows that matter.
- Easy for anyone to use
- Clean UI, no complex training, and built to drive adoption across the org.
- Streamlined for action, not just documentation
- Assessments, questionnaires, inventories, risk tracking, and reporting—all in one place.
- Fast, no-code implementation
- Go live in weeks, not quarters, with minimal IT lift.
- Scales with your program
- Whether you’re running a lean risk function or supporting a large institution, Isora grows with you—without getting in the way.
Who Each Platform Is Best For
| Platform | Who It’s For |
| Black Kite | Translating vendor risk into business terms. More of a lens, not a control system. |
| Bitsight | Companies tracking risk scores for vendors. Looks good on reports but doesn’t dig deep. |
| Isora GRC | Security teams that need a scalable, usable IT risk management program across their organization. |
What Our Customers Say About Isora GRC
Security teams at top institutions are using Isora GRC to replace legacy tools and manual processes with intuitive workflows and actionable insight.
FAQs
What’s the difference between Black Kite, BitSight, and Isora GRC?
Black Kite and BitSight provide external cyber risk ratings based on internet-facing data and threat intelligence. Isora GRC enables security teams to manage third-party risk directly—through assessments, questionnaires, vendor inventories, exception tracking, and collaborative risk registers.
Are Black Kite and BitSight considered vendor risk management platforms?
Not entirely. They are vendor intelligence tools that help organizations monitor external risk signals, but they don’t offer the workflows required to run assessments, assign tasks, or track risk remediation across vendors.
Does Isora GRC replace tools like Black Kite or BitSight?
Yes, especially for teams looking to manage vendor risk actively rather than observe external scores. Isora GRC helps teams run standardized assessments (like HECVAT, CAIQ, SIG), collect evidence, and take action on third-party risks.
Which platform is better for managing vendor risk across the organization?
Isora GRC is purpose-built for managing vendor risk from start to finish. While Black Kite and BitSight surface useful external insights, Isora provides the infrastructure to operationalize third-party risk management across stakeholders.
Can Isora GRC be used alongside Black Kite or BitSight?
Yes. Some teams use Black Kite or BitSight for passive monitoring and pair them with Isora GRC for structured assessments, vendor collaboration, and internal risk tracking.
What should I look for in a third-party risk management platform?
Prioritize platforms that support questionnaires, vendor inventories, risk scoring, and exception workflows. Isora GRC brings all of these capabilities into one system that’s built for collaboration and action—not just observation.
Other Relevant Content 