HECVAT Compliance Software

Send, score, and close higher education vendor assessments, all in one place

Distribute HECVAT questionnaires, import and score vendor responses, track third-party risk, and give your procurement team a defensible answer on any vendor with Isora GRC, the GRC Assessment Platform™ for higher education organizations.

Trusted by established organizations & partners
https://vt.eduhttps://www.af.milhttps://utexas.eduhttps://yale.eduhttps://www.tdi.texas.govhttps://www.ttuhsc.eduhttps://aws.amazon.comhttps://www.osu.eduhttps://www.wilcotx.govhttps://www.utoronto.cahttps://www.tdcj.texas.govhttps://www.uchicago.edu/enhttps://www.utah.eduhttps://dir.texas.govhttps://www.dps.texas.govhttps://www.berkeley.eduhttps://www.techstars.comhttps://cccs.eduhttps://www.iwu.eduhttps://msu.eduhttps://www.auburn.eduhttps://www.stthomas.eduhttps://www.getezmoney.comhttps://www.sait.cahttps://www.ubc.cahttps://www.cuanschutz.eduhttps://www.tjc.eduhttps://marymount.eduhttps://www.umt.eduhttps://www.pdx.eduhttps://www.tccd.eduhttps://ltu.eduhttps://morantechnology.comhttps://www.merit.eduhttps://www.tccd.eduhttps://www.gonzaga.eduhttps://www.bhc.eduhttps://www.dallascollege.edu

Problem

Managing HECVAT compliance can be a logistical nightmare.

For most higher ed security teams, managing the logistics of vendor evaluation is often a bigger challenge than evaluating the vendor itself. Every new SaaS tool, every renewal, and every cloud migration triggers a HECVAT. That means assessing vendor controls against requirements with real enforcement consequences, like FERPA, HIPAA, and GLBA. Usually, that process goes something like this:

The security team emails a spreadsheet, and the vendor takes two weeks to respond. But the response comes back in the wrong version. Scoring is manual, inconsistent across reviewers, and documented nowhere. Evidence (SOC 2 reports, data flow diagrams, security certifications) sits in email attachments with no connection to the assessment it supports. When procurement asks “is this vendor approved?” the answer takes hours of digging through three people’s inboxes.

Meanwhile, the vendor backlog grows. Renewal deadlines slip, new tools go live without a completed assessment, and the security team ends up spending more time on logistics than on evaluating actual risk. The process works at ~20 vendors, but most institutions have ~200.

Solution

One platform for the HECVAT compliance lifecycle.

Isora GRC standardizes HECVAT questionnaires, vendor collaboration, and scoring in a single workspace. The one click HECVAT uploader ingests completed spreadsheets, maps answers, and auto populates scores and evidence so teams avoid manual entry. Isora GRC structures the HECVAT workflow in one connected workspace. Import vendor-completed HECVAT spreadsheets and score them automatically with the one-click uploader. Or, distribute questionnaires and track completion in real time with assessments that link to the vendor’s inventory record, product deployments, and data classifications. Gaps populate the risk register automatically as vendors answer questions and attach evidence. Generate scorecards and reports to give procurement a defensible answer on demand.

HECVAT Import & Scoring

Upload a completed HECVAT spreadsheet and score it in one click.

Upload an existing vendor-completed HECVAT spreadsheet, map answers to questions, and compute scores automatically. Or, distribute HECVAT questionnaires to vendors directly in the platform and track completion, without following up over email.

Learn More

Vendor Inventory

Stop asking, "When was this vendor last assessed?"

Link each vendor record to every HECVAT assessment, product deployment, data classification, contract, contact, and risk rating, all in one place. When procurement needs the status on a vendor, the full assessment history, current risk posture, and supporting documentation are already connected. Teams can search by service type, data sensitivity, and organizational unit, instead of digging through a shared drive.

Learn More

Third-Party Risk Management

Surface HECVAT gaps, assign ownership, and track risks.

Publish gaps directly to the risk register as they surface in HECVAT responses, with full lineage — the specific question that flagged it, the vendor and product it applies to, and the data classification at stake. Then, assign owners, set remediation deadlines, and document risk exceptions, all in one place.

Learn More

Procurement Reporting

Give your procurement team a defensible answer, on demand.

Generate live scorecards for HECVAT completion rates, control gaps, and risk ratings by vendor, product, or organizational unit. Or, export reports for procurement committees, IT governance boards, and leadership reviews. Make consistent and auditable approval and rejection decisions with standardized scoring across every reviewer.

Learn More
Latest News
Our latest content.
Stay informed about GRC with our growing collection of articles, resources, and newsletters written for information security teams.

TPRM Maturity Model: How to Score Third-Party Risk A TPRM maturity model is a self-assessment framework to score how developed a third-party risk...

HECVAT vs VPAT: What’s the Difference and When Do You Need Each? HECVAT and VPAT evaluate different aspects of higher education procurement...

HECVAT vs SOC 2: Key Differences and When You Need Each HECVAT and SOC 2 are two frameworks widely used in higher education procurement to evaluate...

GRC Tools and Solutions for Mid-Market Companies: A Complete Guide Mid-market GRC software is the category of compliance tooling built for growing...

HECVAT Tools and Solutions: A Complete Guide for Procurement Officers HECVAT compliance software is a category of platforms that helps higher...

HECVAT Compliance: Requirements, Certification, and Getting Started HECVAT compliance is the voluntary completion of the Higher Education Community...

Frequently Asked Questions
How can we help?
Find the answers you need here, or chat with us.
Contact Sales
What is HECVAT and why do institutions use it?

HECVAT (Higher Education Community Vendor Assessment Toolkit) is the standard vendor security questionnaire for higher education, developed by EDUCAUSE’s Higher Education Information Security Council. Institutions use it to evaluate cloud service providers against FERPA, HIPAA, and GLBA requirements before approving them for campus use.

How does the one-click HECVAT uploader work?

In Isora GRC, the one-click uploader ingests a vendor-completed HECVAT spreadsheet, matches responses to the corresponding questions, and computes scores automatically. The imported assessment links directly to the vendor’s inventory record and risk history, eliminating manual data entry, formula errors, and version confusion.

Can Isora handle both HECVAT Full and HECVAT Lite?

Yes. Teams using Isora can distribute either version through the platform, import completed spreadsheets with the one-click uploader, track completion, and score results using the same standardized workflow.

How do HECVAT findings connect to the risk register?

With Isora, any HECVAT response indicating a missing or insufficient control can be published directly to the risk register. The risk entry carries full lineage — the specific HECVAT question, the vendor and product it applies to, the data classification at stake, and the remediation plan. This creates the traceability that auditors and procurement committees expect.

How does Isora handle vendor populations at scale?

Isora is the most widely adopted GRC Assessment Platform in higher education, trusted by Virginia Tech, UT Austin, UC Berkeley, Yale, and hundreds of other institutions managing large vendor populations. The one-click uploader, standardized scoring, and connected vendor inventory are specifically designed for the throughput that higher ed procurement cycles demand.

Can Isora manage HECVAT alongside other frameworks?

Yes. Most institutions managing HECVAT also need to address GLBA Safeguards Rule (financial aid data), NIST CSF, HIPAA, and CMMC. Isora supports all of these in the same workspace. The same vendor inventory, risk register, and reporting infrastructure serves every framework without duplicate data entry.

Resource
Map CMMC Level 1 & Level 2 Requirements
Map NIST 800-171 requirements to NIST 800-53, CSF 2.0, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA with CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 requirements and assessment objectives, all in one place.
Access
A screenshot of a CMMC reference tab on a NIST 800-53 multi-framework crosswalk spreadsheet from SaltyCloud, the company behind Isora GRC.